<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/</link>
	<description>Reviews, Trailers, and Much More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-16279</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/#comment-16279</guid>
		<description>To the marketing idiots at 20th Century Fox: don&#039;t worry, I&#039;ll wait till you maroons give us an anamorphic transfer. What year is this???, oh, yeah, 2007!
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the marketing idiots at 20th Century Fox: don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;ll wait till you maroons give us an anamorphic transfer. What year is this???, oh, yeah, 2007!<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-16278</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/#comment-16278</guid>
		<description>Okay, so the movie was sorta funny, I guess. So what? I can&#039;t believe some people actually think this movie is the funniest movie made. That&#039;s just a wee bit of an overstatement. Even though the movie got 4 stars, I don&#039;t think it deserved it. There were a couple funny parts (Do you want any wine? No. Milk? No. Ovaltine? Nothing!) but overall I think Mel Brooks ... out when he did this show. The Producers, for instance, is a lot funnier. But hey, don&#039;t take my word for it.
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so the movie was sorta funny, I guess. So what? I can&#8217;t believe some people actually think this movie is the funniest movie made. That&#8217;s just a wee bit of an overstatement. Even though the movie got 4 stars, I don&#8217;t think it deserved it. There were a couple funny parts (Do you want any wine? No. Milk? No. Ovaltine? Nothing!) but overall I think Mel Brooks &#8230; out when he did this show. The Producers, for instance, is a lot funnier. But hey, don&#8217;t take my word for it.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-16277</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/#comment-16277</guid>
		<description>Dolby digital 1.0 is just like saying MONO!! And a non anamorphic transfer i only have 2 words &quot;Why Bother&quot;???
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dolby digital 1.0 is just like saying MONO!! And a non anamorphic transfer i only have 2 words &#8220;Why Bother&#8221;???<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. A. Tamblyn</title>
		<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-16276</link>
		<dc:creator>P. A. Tamblyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/#comment-16276</guid>
		<description>I bought this movie after reading reveiws on ebay and also reading reveiws elsewhere claming it was one of the funniest movies ever. I was very disapointed with this movie, Laughs where very scarce. Itmay be funny to Frankenstein fans, but being born it the 80&#039;s, I have never seen a classic frankenstein movie. I have seen Abbott and Costello Meets Frankenstein, and Carry on Screaming, both of wich I found to be far more humerous than this movie. If you are a huge Frankenstein Fan or  a Mell Brooks Fan you may like this movie, but anyone else I would recomend that you try before you buy (rent).
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this movie after reading reveiws on ebay and also reading reveiws elsewhere claming it was one of the funniest movies ever. I was very disapointed with this movie, Laughs where very scarce. Itmay be funny to Frankenstein fans, but being born it the 80&#8242;s, I have never seen a classic frankenstein movie. I have seen Abbott and Costello Meets Frankenstein, and Carry on Screaming, both of wich I found to be far more humerous than this movie. If you are a huge Frankenstein Fan or  a Mell Brooks Fan you may like this movie, but anyone else I would recomend that you try before you buy (rent).<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan W. Armes</title>
		<link>http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/comment-page-1/#comment-16275</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan W. Armes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atatheatrenearyou.org/young-frankenstein/#comment-16275</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t usually disagree with the general concensus of reviewers, but this time it&#039;s personally unavoidable. i viewed this film for the first time this past weekend after purchasing it. i considered it to be very mundane for comedy. the contradiction in terms is intentional. i may have been amused to the extent of laughing twice throughout the entire film. if this is any example of Mel Brook&#039;s greatest comical acheivement then his brand of humor is assinine at best. this one would have have played better as a dramatic remake of the original. sorry Mel, you&#039;re just not funny. &lt;p&gt;as for the the DVD, it has enough extras to satisfy fans of this supposed comic film director/producer.
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t usually disagree with the general concensus of reviewers, but this time it&#8217;s personally unavoidable. i viewed this film for the first time this past weekend after purchasing it. i considered it to be very mundane for comedy. the contradiction in terms is intentional. i may have been amused to the extent of laughing twice throughout the entire film. if this is any example of Mel Brook&#8217;s greatest comical acheivement then his brand of humor is assinine at best. this one would have have played better as a dramatic remake of the original. sorry Mel, you&#8217;re just not funny. as for the the DVD, it has enough extras to satisfy fans of this supposed comic film director/producer.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

